Wolves 2-1 Tottenham: A Critical Analysis by Brains and Stelios

In their match review, Brains and Stelios from Tottenham Away offered a detailed and critical analysis of Tottenham Hotspur’s 2-1 defeat to Wolverhampton Wanderers. Their discussion, filled with a blend of technical insights and passionate fan perspective, dissected the game’s key moments and broader issues within the club.

A Disappointing Defeat

The review began with a stark acknowledgment of Tottenham’s defeat, described as a “sucker punch” that had been looming throughout the game. Despite leading until the 84th minute, Spurs’ performance was deemed lacking in creativity and control, particularly in midfield. The stats were telling: Wolves dominated with 17 shots to Tottenham’s six and created more clear-cut chances.

Midfield and Defensive Concerns

Brains and Stelios criticized Yves Bissouma’s performance, noting his lack of impact and the void left by the absence of key players like Maddison and Van de Ven. They also pointed out the defensive lapses, particularly from Eric Dier and Ben Davies, despite Davies being one of the better performers. The lack of pace and power in defense was a significant concern.

Tactical and Managerial Decisions

The duo supported manager Ange Postecoglou, attributing the loss more to player quality than tactics. They emphasized the need for creativity in midfield, suggesting that Giovani Lo Celso and Rodrigo Bentancur could have been more effective if they had started the game.

The Bigger Picture: Squad Depth and Management

A significant part of the discussion focused on the broader issues at Tottenham, particularly regarding squad depth and management. Brains and Stelios criticized the club’s reliance on a few key players and the lack of quality in the squad beyond the first eleven. They argued that this has been a recurring issue under various managers, not just a problem specific to Postecoglou’s tenure.

Individual Performances

The review also touched on individual performances. While Ben Davies was praised for his efforts, other players like Emerson Royal and Pierre-Emile HĂžjbjerg were criticized for underperforming. The attacking players, including Son Heung-min and Bryan Gil, were also noted for their lack of impact.

Looking Ahead

Looking forward, Brains and Stelios expressed concern about upcoming fixtures against teams like Aston Villa and Manchester City. They were realistic about the challenges Tottenham faces with the current squad and the potential for more disappointing results.


In summary, Brains and Stelios’ review of Tottenham’s loss to Wolves was a blend of technical analysis and passionate fan commentary. They highlighted the need for significant changes in the squad and management to address the recurring issues at the club. Their critique extended beyond the match itself, questioning the long-term direction and leadership of Tottenham Hotspur.

Posted in ,

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top